HDRtist Pro Rendering - http://www.ohanaware.com/hdrtistpro/

The Vancouver Courier, Sept. 10

by Geoff Olson

The late Texan journalist Molly Ivins once wrote that “the truth, that little slippery bugger has the oddest habit of being way to hell off on one side or the other: it seldom nestles neatly halfway between any two opposing points of view.”

“It’s of no help to either the readers or the truth to quote one side saying, “Cat,” and the other side saying “Dog,” while the truth is there’s an elephant crashing around out there in the bushes,” Ivins observed.

With the B.C. Liberal government’s defiance of a Supreme Court decision to restore class size and composition clauses (illegally stripped from the BCTF contract by education minister Christy Clark and former Premier Gordon Campbell in 2002), and their rejection of binding arbitration, I don’t see tufts of cat and dog hair in the Victoria/BCTF scrap.  I see elephant footprints.

Last February the Alberni Valley News reported that B.C. government lead negotiator Paul Straszak “admitted in court that his strategy in 2012 negotiations with the B.C. Teachers’ Federation was to provoke a full-scale strike.” Supposedly the intent was to further alienate the public to the union.

Straszak reportedly shared this notion in a briefing with Premier Christy Clark’s deputy minister John Dyble before a cabinet meeting.

So a cynical scheme to incite war between teachers and the government goes right up to Clark’s door. There is no evidence it went past it, and no evidence it didn’t. Either way, I can imagine ex-premier Gordon Campbell in a flight suit, standing on the deck of an aircraft carrier with a banner behind him reading, “Mission Accomplished.”

Speaking of bogus victories, our neighbours to the south are well ahead of us in transforming education. In the last decade, a heavily financed  campaign has undercut US teachers, demonized their unions, gutted education budgets, and served up public schools like carrion to vulture capitalists.

In a 2010 corporate press release from, News Corporation Chairman and CEO, Rupert Murdoch wrote, “When it comes to K through 12 education, we see a $500 billion sector in the U.S. alone that is waiting desperately to be transformed by big breakthroughs that extend the reach of great teaching…”

We need only to look to the disaster of US health care delivery to imagine American K-12 education after Murdoch and his fellow travellers are finished with it. Do we really want to follow the American model, when BC already has the second highest rate of independent school enrolment in Canada?

This province also has the second worst per student education funding in Canada. Stories of BC teachers and parents paying out of pocket for school supplies are commonplace and factual. Sightings of school librarians, counsellors and music teachers are becoming as rare as spirit bears and marbled murrelets.

We’ve heard plenty about greedy, overpaid teachers trying to outpace their public sector counterparts, but a Globe and Mail study puts B.C. teachers squarely in the middle of national compensation. Beyond that, there are a big, complex problems in servicing special needs students, but a school-suspending standoff that stresses families’ finances and schedules is hardly the royal road to resolution.

Last week, I witnessed a small group of upset parents confront North Vancouver District MLA Jane Thornthwaite at her office. “This forty dollars a day, is that a voucher system? Is that what we’re looking at? Is that where you guys are taking us without telling us?” asked one mother in a trembling voice.

I’m wondering too. Is this mooted $40 scheme about privatization by stealth, with B.C. parents softened up through bribes/hush money? Is this refusal to negotiate about making public schooling so dysfunctional Victoria can point to it as a failed experiment?

At this point, we have little reason to believe that the B.C. Liberal government’s attempt to starve out the teachers isn’t just a first move, before smashing open public school funding like a piñata for those with no stake in the idea of “common good”.

There is nothing “liberal” about Clark’s zero-sum game with the teachers’s union. In fact, you can’t even describe the provincial government  as conservative, since that word connotes “conserving.”  No, our leaders in Victoria are best described as radicals. Or rogue elephants of the Republican/Tea Party variety.

The Vancouver Courier, Sept. 12


  1. Excellent article, Geoff. Great to see someone saying similar things to what I’m thinking. I’ve been thinking something similar about the “Conservative” parties – that they aren’t conservative by the meaning of the word. They aren’t conservative or cautious.
    . . . They are radical, and they are slowly dismantling the infrastructure that we build to support our civilization: education, law, government, highways, and health. They would be more accurately be described as a business party.

    And I’m really noticing how almost nobody is interested in examining both sides of an issue. People refuse to even admit that another side exists. They refuse to look at the pros and cons of the different proposals.
    . . . All these public issues become gigantic scapegoats and garbage pits for us to dump all the anger and rage and helplessness we build up from life. Teachers, unions, bike lanes. They just become a punching bag, and to hell with actual long term results and effects on us all.

    Denial. I have this vague theory that I think is probably 100% right, but that I only dimly understand, if that: We deal with the world with our animal building blocks of fight-or-flight responses of avoidance, and control and attack.
    . . . And we build up such thick coats of armour and defense and attack, that we refuse to admit that the world exists, lest it overwhelm us in its complexity and reality. I think we are even in denial that we ourselves exist; that others exist; that anything exists.
    . . . And I guess, psychologically, that that approach causes huge anger to build up that wants but to destroy. Like the leaders from antiquity you hear about that are exiled/punished, and return to burn everything down in revenge.

    And hence, we attack those who are our main supports in raising our children.

  2. Or maybe its just fear and panic. And an appeal to Authority to make everything all right and make the trains run on time.

    I keep trying to connect everything to a quantuum-psycho-spiritual answer that will teach me something deep. Maybe if I swim enough in deep waters, I’ll begin to be able to see the light. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s